Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

JUSTICES JUSTICE.

(To the Editor of the Patka Mail.) Sir, —Allow me through the medium of your paper to point out to' the public how different persons were treated in the li.M. Court, Carlyle, last week. In the ease of a laborer, who had to employ a man to do his work, viz., carting metal on the road, he was allowed a half day’s wages only, the lI.M. saying he would have time to return and do a half day’s work. In the case of a settler appearing as a witness, the R.M. suggested half a day’s allowance would be sufficient, viz., five shillings. In the Harbor Petition case he allowed a guinea to G-. P. Sherwood for attending, that being the amount allowed to gentlemen. Query—Does he come under that heading? and why could not the lI.M. treat him in the same way as the laborer? —I am &c., OBSERVER.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PATM18780313.2.12.2

Bibliographic details

Patea Mail, Volume III, Issue 303, 13 March 1878, Page 2

Word Count
151

JUSTICES JUSTICE. Patea Mail, Volume III, Issue 303, 13 March 1878, Page 2

JUSTICES JUSTICE. Patea Mail, Volume III, Issue 303, 13 March 1878, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert