Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A NON-APPRECIATOR.

(To the Editor of the Patea Mail.) Sir, —In your paper the other day, t was rather surprised at such twaddle being 1 reported—l mean the report of the Debating Society, Mauutahi. I am hot at all surprised at the decision come to, Grass v. Corn. Without mentioning names, I think at least two parties that spoke on the question can grow verylittle of either grass or com ; and I trust the next time you report a debate, you will have a subject handled by men that can and have made both corn growing and grass growing pay, then they will be considered as authoiities, and not be laughed at.—l am, &c., ONE WHO FARMS TO PAY.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PATM18770627.2.15.1

Bibliographic details

Patea Mail, Volume III, Issue 231, 27 June 1877, Page 2

Word Count
119

A NON-APPRECIATOR. Patea Mail, Volume III, Issue 231, 27 June 1877, Page 2

A NON-APPRECIATOR. Patea Mail, Volume III, Issue 231, 27 June 1877, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert