CARLYLE TOWN BOARD.
(TO THE EDITOR OF THE PATEA MAIL.) Sir, —I notice that the question of who paid the costs in the case Ivess v. Carlyle Town Board is being discuiscd in your columns. The following may bo the correct solution of the question.at issue. Previous to the case being heard, it was stated by a prominent member of the Board, thatVveu should the case be decided against the Board, the ratepayers should not be the sufferers by having to pay the costs, so it may be that tire members have paid the costs between them, and that would account for the item (about £7), not appearing in the balance-sheet. I am, &c., RATEPAYER. Patea, May 2Cth, 187 G.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PATM18760527.2.8.3
Bibliographic details
Patea Mail, Volume II, Issue 118, 27 May 1876, Page 2
Word Count
120CARLYLE TOWN BOARD. Patea Mail, Volume II, Issue 118, 27 May 1876, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in