Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

R.M. COURT COSTS.

(to the■ editor of the patka mail.) Sir, —Noticing a letter in yonr paper "of Saturday, the2othinst., signed “Pro Bonn Publico,” referring to a summons which I had issued against U. O’Sullivan, and to prevent your readers from forming any erroneous views respecting this matter, I beg to leave the facts before you. Mr D. O’Sullivan owed me 14s, which he refused to pay, and 1 1 was reluctantly obliged to proceed for the recovery of the same, and to prove my case clearly to the Court, I was absolutely ..compelled to subpoena two witnesses. I was informed on the morning of the hearing by the Clerk of the Court, that O’Sullivan had paid the sUm of IDs into Court, leaving a balance of 10s still due for witnesses’ expenses. On the case being called before Major Turner, R.M., he asked me if I would take, the amount of IDs as full settlement, and said, without hearing any explanation, that it was “ Rot, rot, d —d rot to summons witnesses in a case of 145,” and that he would not allow the expenses, bnt would strike them out, which I had paid into. Court. After very high talk between the, magistrate, defendant,and myself he informed me that he would take a week to consider over the matt.ei', and next'Friday,he would deliver judgment. I remonstrated with him on the subject, pointing out the absurdity of taking a week for consideration, bnt in vain. I was very much astonished that Major Turner should think the amount paid into Court sufficient, without first hearing the merits of the case in question. It would appear to ■■the-uninitiated that hoi nad some means arrived at the verdict ro be given before coming into Court, as he would not be enlightened while on the bench ; but seeing that his settled ideas did not coincide with mine, he required another seven days, and no doubt during that time several consultations (as “ Pro Bono Publico” very ably remarks) with the Attorney-General and other learned authorities. By giving this space in your valuable paper yon will oblige. I am, &0., If.McGuire,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PATM18760524.2.8.3

Bibliographic details

Patea Mail, Volume II, Issue 117, 24 May 1876, Page 2

Word Count
355

R.M. COURT COSTS. Patea Mail, Volume II, Issue 117, 24 May 1876, Page 2

R.M. COURT COSTS. Patea Mail, Volume II, Issue 117, 24 May 1876, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert