QUESTION OF PEGGING
THAMES, September 13. Mr Burgess, warden, im. delivering judgment in a case where, after a decree of forfeiture had been granted, the applicant claimed to have repegged the ground by formally placing his hands on the existing pegs, stated that this was not sufficient to constitute a proper marking out, new pegs required to be put in. Their coincidence in the position of the previously existing peg 3 cannot be regarded as a marking out. The magistrate held that the claim had not been marked out according to law, and refused the application.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW19090915.2.138.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Otago Witness, Issue 2896, 15 September 1909, Page 29
Word count
Tapeke kupu
96QUESTION OF PEGGING Otago Witness, Issue 2896, 15 September 1909, Page 29
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Otago Witness. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in