S. R. COURT.

Otaki Mail, 5 October 1923, Page 3

S. R. COURT.

OTAKI—THURSDAY. (Before J. Logan Stout, Esq., S.M.) Breach of Licensing Laws. Police v. B. Jackson. —Charge of being on licensed premises contrary to Statute.—No appearance of accused. Constable Cole stated that he found the accused on licensed premises on a Sunday, and on questioning him was told he had called to pay an account. Oji further questions being put he found Jackson 1 ad no money. —Pined £1 and costs 7s. Wandering Stock. J. Hu.ka.raia (Mr. Atmore) v. E. Hopkins.—Charge of allowing stock to wander. There was no appearance of defendant who was lined 5s and costs 7s. Civil Cases. The following civil cases were awarded by default:—P. R. Holtom (Mr. Atmore) v. Prank and James Paton, claim £lO6 Pis I'd, costs £6 10s; A. J. Robinson (Mr. Atmore) v. W. Potter, claim ■ t2 2s (id, costs 24s (id; Te Horo Dairy Co. (Mr. Atmore) v. D. Courtney, claim £l7 17s, costs £■'!; Same ,v. H. Clay, claim £45 3s (id, costs £3 ss; Te Horo Dairy Co. (Mr. Atmore) v. Charlotte Duggan (Mr. Bcrgin), claim for £3.1 ss--2d —The Magistrate delivered jlldgaient in favour of the plaintiff for the whole amount claimed. Court costs i- 2s and solicitor's fee £3 2s. Judgment Summonses. K. J. Port and Odlin and Co. (Mr. Atmore) v. H. Tatana. —Claim £3.1. <Js--5d. —Ordered to pay £1 per week. Te Horo Dairy Co. (Mr. Atmore) v. A. Gunson. —Claim £l2 Ss (id.—No order. Te Horo Dairy Co. (Mr. Atmore) v. !. Myers— Clair £2l His 2d.—Ordered in pay £1 per week. Len Kilmistor (Mr. Atmore) v. Joe Mira. —Claim £36 19s. —Ordered to pay £1 per week. H. B. Wise (Mr. Atmore) v. D. Courtney.—Claim £l4 10s 6d— No order. A. J. Robinson (Mr. Atmore) v. G. Cripps-Collans. —Claim £5 lis Id. — Ordered to pay Ss per week on each of two accounts. A. .1. Walls (Mr. Atmore) v. Utiku iiepcta— Claim £1 Is b'd. —Ordered to pay forthwith. In the case Myers v. Grant there was no appearance of plaintiff and Mr. Siaveley, solicitor for defendant, applied for expenses (15s) for Grant which were allowed.