Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MOTOR COLLISION.

JENSEN V. SMITH. rII m . Reserved judgment was given in the r case, recently reported in the'“Mail,” • in which Hans Jensen claimed from j Archie Smith £I2S 17s fid, alleged damaged received in a recent motor-car i accident on Tasman Hoad. The S.M. ’ considered that both drivers were on ; their right sides, said the road was narrow’, and thought neither driver showed j carelessness, nor were they travelling ! at an excessive speed. It was, lie considered, a pure accident, and he would therefore give judgment for defendant. - Costs to four witnesses (£2 Ss), court costs (9s),' and solicitor’s fee (£6 S») were allowed. Mr. A. M. Dunklov (Otaki) appeared for the defendant and Mr. Grant (Palmerston North) for the plaintiff.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OTMAIL19230803.2.17

Bibliographic details

Otaki Mail, 3 August 1923, Page 3

Word Count
122

MOTOR COLLISION. Otaki Mail, 3 August 1923, Page 3

MOTOR COLLISION. Otaki Mail, 3 August 1923, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert