ManaiA S.M. Court.
♦ Thursday, 15th November.
(Before Major Tu’;o, S.M.).
Police v. EBerm. The defendant (a boy) was charged with throwing a dog about 50 feet from the Manaia Tower. Defendant to come up for judgment when calhdupon. Wichmann v. J. McGregor. Owing to defendant’s solicitor being unable to attend, an adjournment was applied for. Adjournment granted. Costs allowed to plaintiff. M. Franklin v. E. Briggs, claim 4s 6d for an empty cask. Case adjourned for defendant to find his witnesses. M. Franklin v. Whare Eei, claim £1 Bs. Judgment by default. W. H. Bolton v. Graham. Application for rehearing. Mr Bonnet (for Graham) appeared in support of ths motion. The Magistrate objected to this, as his former decision was not contrary to law, and stated that plaintiff’s solicitor should have appealed. The reheaiing of fresh evidence was, however, allowed. The evidence of G. McLean, Ahu Ahu, and Matahaere having been heard, judgment was reserved.
H. Betts v. John Hayes. No appearance of either party. Patterson v. Ahu Ahu, claim £lO ou account of a dray. Plaintiffs solicitor (Mr Scott-Smith) applied for immediate execution in order to prevent the native from selling the dray on account of which the claim arose. Granted.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OPUNT18941116.2.16
Bibliographic details
Opunake Times, Volume I, Issue 40, 16 November 1894, Page 3
Word Count
202ManaiA S.M. Court. Opunake Times, Volume I, Issue 40, 16 November 1894, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in