THE HOME
SHORT. SKIRTS EDICT , ‘ Dress designers in Hollywood will revolt against an edict from Paris that skirts are to he shorter. Milo- Anderson, a designer, said that gowns tor his studio’s stars will actually be longer for the coining season. ’ ‘ "Skirts,” he said, ‘‘will'in fact clear the lioor by not more tiian 12in. A skirt clearing the floor by 16in. rereals a. naturally ugly .break in the feminine leg. -
“As a matter of fact, there are few stars to-day whose legs would bear showing.”
HAVE YOU GOT “YUMPH?”
Have you got yiimpli? No, it is wot a disease. It is what makes you successful in -love, in business, in everything else. Yumph isn’t just what used to be called “It.” it is combination of pep, personality, and sex-appeal.
The word first made its- appearance in the film “Double Wedding.” But it was sweeping HoJyhvood even before that, and now it is sweeping Britain. ' A Sunday Referee reporter set oiii. to discover whether yumph really exists! outside films, and, if so, what are its characteristics.
It does exist, though psychologists do not like the word.
) Clearly Recognised.
*"A psychological specialist attached to the Council for Mental Hygiene said: “Well, there’s no one vord known to psychologists to describe it, but I think we can clearly recognise certain factors that make, for success iii business, love, and the other walks of life.
“Ingredients are leadership, selfassurance, foresight, a certain amount of aggressiveness and initiative. “Can one develop them? Well, the ingredients I have called initiative is very much an inborn one. It takes a lot of training to develop it in these who have not got it. In some fields it may be counterfeited by bluff.
Psycho-Analyst’s Opinon.
Said; a psycho-analyst; “A confident attitude towards life is the principal symptom of this happy state_of affairs
in tlie personality. I should think that Mr. Hore-Belisha, Mussolini, and Miss Grade Fields have it.” Miss Margaret Rawlings, the actress, whom most people would consider as possessing yumph, commented: . “I certainly would not use r n.jch a word. ' I won’t even call it V it’s only a sub-luiman noise. ’V>i* ---jj “Why not use the other words that ?h describe the eliaracteriajrjj. --supposed to be described by . . .rtfoLl won’t % say it.” vi *
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OPNEWS19380523.2.26
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Opotiki News, Volume I, Issue 35, 23 May 1938, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
377THE HOME Opotiki News, Volume I, Issue 35, 23 May 1938, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Opotiki News (1996) Ltd is the copyright owner for the Opotiki News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Opotiki News (1996) Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.