Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAIN POINTS REFUTED

SOVIET NOTE TO PERSIA OIL CONCESSIONS QUESTION Rec. 8 p.m. TEHERAN, Nov. 24. The Persian Cabinet, after discussing the Soviet Note, in which Russia warned Persia of the “grave consequences which may follow rejection of the proposed Soviet oil agreement,” made a reply refuting the* five main points of the Note. One point refuted is the Soviet accusation of “blatant discrimination against the Soviet Union in view of the still existing British oil concession in South Persia.” The Persian Cabinet’s reply insists that the South Persian concession was granted when Persia was without a constitution, and there was, therefore, no possibility of consulting the Persian people.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19471126.2.50

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Otago Daily Times, Issue 26628, 26 November 1947, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
109

MAIN POINTS REFUTED Otago Daily Times, Issue 26628, 26 November 1947, Page 5

MAIN POINTS REFUTED Otago Daily Times, Issue 26628, 26 November 1947, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert