Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

KANGAROOS ARE SPEEDY

,y ■ -i-

Waratalf Fast Open Play Dazzles Northern Opposition (Prom "N.Z. Truth's" Special Auckland Representative.) TN, beating Auckland by 19 points to 8, the visiting Waratahs made a very auspicipus opening for their New, Zealand tour, The win was an unexpected one, both by the visitors and the local Auckland supporters.

AFTER a successful tour south', it was thought that Auckland would be too good for the Aussies, and -this opinion was held by their man- ■' aspr hut like many other 11 good things ft came unnut Though m line-outs the home team * might have" had the better ofthe play, there was.no other phase of it that they were the equals of the light blues. Wi^a-hefty^clc it was.anticipated that Auckland y woudgiTe their speedy ■ lacks great chances to score, but these chances seldom came. - The visitors hooked the ball more often'than the .home side,. and' with • Sid. Malcolm sending put passes with such precision the enterprising, rearguard opened up play with great dash. In loose rushes, the home pack started off well, but faded away m the finish. The forwards were lifeless and put ho sustained sting I into .their .work.' Just why they failed so badly m this is incomV prehensibie; ■ - The exclusion of Anderson and the Inclusion-of Laurie.Knight was, m, the opinion: of many, a false step'to make, as Anderson had done so well through- ' ' out the season's club play and later m rep matches, whilst Knight had just come on the scene during«the last few weeks 'Bustlingplay by the visiting backs nuzzled, th'& home rearguard, and they seemed all at'sea, continually doing the wrong thing or, mulling the ball. There was movement a-plenty by the visitors and the ball* flew'about at a great pace, ' 'W.^&J^^^'^^9^^ ,-^ * . :v , m the secbnd spell the Aussies made y determined attacks from the rear Vision. With accurate passing and ygpoA judgment 'm kicking they had the ;YKpnie team doing their^best to keep the n: line from being crossed again. ■ ,/ YLater play centred for a time m the •■ visitors' twenty-five, and from a scrum Ythe ball came to, Jenkin who saw an •opening and took, advantage, scoring In-a handy position. He converted "his own try. Auckland's, hopes, then rose and : they were urged on to do them best.; They" attacked with more vim, biit Towers again relieved by one of .''.. .his fine kicks;';'...' : -..<.. ' ■ v. . , . • Keeping an' advantage gained by Jenkin, the Auckland forwards more 'than held their own m some loose . -work, getting-the ball out to' Jenkin ...again who'sent on to, Hook, who transferred to Stuart, the .latter scoring a brilliant try. ; ;'•.,.• ' With two points to the good it was thought that the Auckland team were V how coming into their, own, but the i- hope did hot last long foi- the visitors V isobn took the lead. .The home team at this stage looked ; Jike a beaten one, and played like it. Malcolm's cleverness behind the scrum was too much*_foi* them. The game could'not by any means be called a; first-tflass oner hut- the ■winners were the better '.team on the; day's play and well de,.J served their win. . ■/■ V; .iiiu' i' «/».+fl«u",., a. *h« . At fUH.-back, Westfield^was. th^e ■ right man m .the.^*a/.W Never once did he wss^a ball and. ,; on one opcasron only was he.,-. ■caught m possession. . : Towers was a tower of strength to :: his side. His well-judged kicking, ■!•-■•■ strong running and accurate fielding t was a: feature of the game. 'His try v 1 was an epic. "'.■'.'■ Hemingway,;:on .the.' wing, was ira-

pressive . but did not get too much play. White, on the/other wing, proved himself a versatile player and a strong runneT. At five-eighths/George did his work well and was a safe connecting link between the half and three-quarter lirie. ■■■.".■_. ... ... _qq the. diminutive half was the herb of the game. Undoubtedly he is the, inspirationtothe team They rely on him and he did not fail m any one respect. Cerruti proved himself a forward ofthe strong bustling .type and Was invariably with the loose play j n the. open. . - o. Connor was another that impressed. He is a solid worker, Rosenblaum is an opportunist and able to join m with the backs m rushing tactics. He scored a try through this. . ' v ' /■■ Not Up To Standard . ■ .. . - • It cannot be said tnat any one of Auckland's- team rose to the occasion, PaeWai, so .far as taking a ball was concerned was quite 'all right, but m tackling he, took no risks personally, He has losthis .dash m, this respect, Falwasser m defence was not oyersuccessful, but this can be applied to all, the backs-bar. Stuart. The. elusive Albert had. New South Wales supporters "thinking liard when he put m some of his jinky runs, but unfortunately he uses no judgment at the finish and either ends .up with a wild pass or by being caught m possession. . \ B*ua* wa t J, Va° Und * eßt' °l 2e.' ' , bf?ks, though he didjiot reach the standard expected. His. try. was. a , very fine effort. , Minns was disappointing on the whole. His weakness m tackling was again apparent, though he .did -bump. hite.o^ r a c' ouple of times. In attack hig WQrk wag ite -od_B6l;h R> Hook and Jenkin were much below .anticipations. Jenkin has been v playing good," bright football up till this game, but he seemed utterly at sea on Saturday. It might, have been a different tale had Li. Hook been on deck. Carter was not impressive, but he had a hardl row to hoe behind the pack as it was playing. .- . • t- The Van - ... •. "~- - , .. Linton returned from-tne southern trlp with a fipe reputation, but did not enhance it m this game. ••: „ - '• •'• ; Batty endeavored to get his forwards going, but evidently found .the task a hard one. Occasionally they showed bursts of what they were capable of,, but could not (or would not) sustain the effort. ."■'•-. ' . . " He.-- headed some hefty rushes and, had several others kept along with him, things might have been different, ..Finlayson played a good solid game and did. his part well, Bert Palmer was always m the front with the loose rushes and did a lot m ■ spoiling the visitors; back work. He alsg faded away at Hie finish: Neither Knights played wlmt.was exed of An Blacka. ;The,tekm - vbuld have been better with Anderson than L> j__nlght; r Both of them gave N.S.W. free-kicks for infringements. r Cathcart" did some fine Work m the loose and on the line-outs. He is a good solid forward always doing his best. Wanoa holds his pack together, but seems to have lost his dash m the open.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTR19280830.2.53.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

NZ Truth, Issue 1187, 30 August 1928, Page 14

Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,102

KANGAROOS ARE SPEEDY NZ Truth, Issue 1187, 30 August 1928, Page 14

KANGAROOS ARE SPEEDY NZ Truth, Issue 1187, 30 August 1928, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert