IMPUDENT FRAUD
DISHONEST TRUSTEE CLAIM FOR MONEYS ADVANCED Per Association. WANGANUI, November 19. An interesting case in which James Stuart claimed from Frank Hedgman £1024 for moneys advanced from time to time to be looked after by Hedgman, concluded in the Supreme Court to-day before Mr Justice Reed. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff for £S2G 14s lid with costs. The judge said that he-could not help remarking that t it was an impudent fraud. The evidence had shown that Hedgman had acted as a sort of adviser for Stuart, and got him to send from time to ftfne his earnings, stating that he would look after them for him. Stuart could not got a statement of how affairs stood.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19261120.2.45
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Times, Volume LIII, Issue 12609, 20 November 1926, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
120IMPUDENT FRAUD New Zealand Times, Volume LIII, Issue 12609, 20 November 1926, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in