Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LABOUR CONFERENCE

LIVELY DEBATE ON SIX-HOURS’ DAY MOTION. (Received February 10, 0.25 a.m.) SYDNEY, February 9. On a motion by Mr Chris. Watson, tho Labour Conference had a lively debate, and by 52 votes to 14 rescinded the six-hours’ day motion. Mr Watson and others argued that the six-hours’ day motion might lose the party seats at the coming elections, alad that the platform advocated all that was necessary in that direction as contained in the section in favour of reducing the hours to forty-four weekly on account of the increased • productivity of labour, with eight hours from bank-to-bank for coal-miners, and six hours for all other underground workers.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19130210.2.75.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 8350, 10 February 1913, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
109

LABOUR CONFERENCE New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 8350, 10 February 1913, Page 8

LABOUR CONFERENCE New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 8350, 10 February 1913, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert