SUPREME COURT—IN BANCO.
Thursday, September 25. (Before his Honor Mr. Justice Richmond.) HOLMWOOD V. THE -MERCANTILE MARINE AND EIRE INSURANCE COMPANY. This was a demurrer case, Mr, Travers appearing for the demurrer, and Mr. Buckley in support of the declaration. After hearing the argument, the Court reserved judgment. SMITH (APPELLANT) V. JOHNSTON (RESPONDENT). This was a motion by Mr. Ollivier, for respondent, for costs under section 21 of the Appeals from Justices Act, 1867. Mr. H. Travers appeared for appellant. Verbal notice of appeal was given. SCHULTZ V. CORPORATION OF WELLINGTON. This was a motion for a rule to show cause against a rule granted on the 16th, which was to show cause why a previous rule should not be set aside. Mr. Ollivier appeared for plaintiff, and Mr. Travers for defendants. The arguments wore lengthy, and a number of cases were quoted. It was ultimately decided that upon the plaintiff agreeing to strike out the third count of the declaration, the rule would be discharged without costs. The Court then adjourned till next day.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM18790926.2.20
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Times, Volume XXXIV, Issue 5770, 26 September 1879, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
175SUPREME COURT—IN BANCO. New Zealand Times, Volume XXXIV, Issue 5770, 26 September 1879, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in