RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

New Zealand Times, Volume XXXIV, Issue 5734, 15 August 1879, Page 5

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Thursday, August 14. (Before T. A. Mansford, Esq., R.M.) JBDGMENT SUMMONS.

Mclntyre v. Ah Ghee ; £2 10s. 7d. Ordered to pay in one month, or three weeks’ imprisonment in default.—A. Wend v. J. Valentine ; £9 13s. To pay in seven days, in default six weeks’ imprisonment.—Miller and another v. Webb ; £5 2s. To be paid by weekly instalments of 205., or to go to gaol for four weeks.—W. Munro v. D. P. Playfair ; £lB 3s. 9d. To pay balance of debt in seven days, or to go to gaol for six weeks.—Mclntyre v. Peacock ; £8 15s. Id. To pay by instalments of 2s. 6d. weekly, in default four weeks’ imprisonment.—S. Hood v. J. Solomon ; £7 10s. 6d. To pay in six weeks, in default four weeks’ imprisonment.—Webber Brothers v. Dr. Watts ; £3 os. 7d. To pay in seven days, in default fourteea days’ imprisonment C. Mclntyre v. Wm. Clout; £7 19s. To pay by weekly instalments of 7s. 6d., or to go to gaol for six weeks.—Shannon v. Manning ; £0 9s. To pay in seven days, or go to gaol for four weeks. CIVIL CASES. Judgment for plaintiff was given as follows ; —Brown v. Shields, 18s. lid.; Do v. Boyd, £3 12s. lid.; Do v. Fenton, 11s. 4d.; Do. v. Vivian, £5 10s, fid.; Do, y, Brown, £2l7s, 2d,;

Falconer’s estate v. Ritson, £l2 19s. lOd.; Bishop, v. Dwan, £3 14s. 3d.; Cleland v. Brightwell, £1 6s ,7d.; Trustee of Cameron and Go. v. Curtis, £l3 os. 9d.; Olelaud v. Pedder, £1,6 Is. 6d.; Hayes v. Austing, £lO 16s. 7d.; Gear v. Woods, £l2 13s. 4d.; Trustee of Cameron v. Woodhouse, £1 Bs. 6d.; Cleland v. Maunsell, £2 14s. ; Williams aud Cameron’s f state v. Cooper, £1 13s. 6J. ; Same v. Spiers, £2l 14s. ; Same v. Collins, £1 Bs. 6d, ; Same v. Ke-teven, £2 13s. 6d.; Same v. Wardell, 3-. 6d. ; Anderson and Jansen v. Ingpen, £lB 15s. 2d. ; Gee v. George, £1 3j. Id, ; Williams and Cameron’s estate v. Sherriu, £1 10s.; Same v. Pepper, £56 75.; Brown v. Barber, £9 3s. Bd.; Mason’s trustee v. Gormerley, £8 13s. 4d. ; Fisk v. Ingley, £2O ; Williams and Cameron’s estate v. Squires, £3 Bs. 6d. Moncktou v. Cross.—ln this case, plaintiff, a photographer, sued Victor Crosse, dentist, for £3 10s., rent of premises in Manners-street. Mr. Hutchison appeared for plaintiff, and Mr. Ollivier for defendant. Em the defence it was contended that defendant was ejected from the premises before the expiration of his agreement, and for this there was a cross-action for damages to the amount of £2O. It was agreed to hear both actions as one, and after the evidence of the principals had been heard, the case was remanded.