FIREPROOF DOORS.—IRON v. TIN.
(From the Insurance . Agent and Insurance Review.) ■ ; : “-■We called' attention’ in onr last number to. the fact that!wooden doors covered-with tin have proved more - effective in - resisting. the Spread of . flames than Iron doors. , -i The reason of this is obvious. Iron presents the same Weakness when used ,for -doors as when-em-ployed for the beams and supports of buildings. While it will hot burn; it is extremely susceptible to the influence of -boat in other ways, warping and bending to such an extent; as. to allow;, the fire! free, passage,besides being an hpcelleht' conductor, and thereby convoying heat enough’ to iiye. combustibles on the other side. ' The' Manufacturers Mutual, , ; of, Boston; has lately issued a [circular on this sub-, ject, confirming ;froin . facts in its own experi; ehce the superior value of; tin. Mr-Whitingi. theisecretary.'says’:^-’', “ I have usually visited the scene, of, all. fires reported to this ..office in which we yvere interested as underwriters, whether,the,damage was •nainih or littleand I . may, say . that,T,have never yet seen a well-made wooden tinned, door .which gave way to..the-fire , and Xhave.no 'recollection of any case,in which an iron door of-ordinary construction, subjected to a heavy(fire; has proved reliable. Among the many ‘picker fires (which have happehed in mills insured by this company since 1862, only one has proved destructive to.the mill, and,the door in ’ this! case dividing, the! picker : rbbm' from.the ''nfill was ofirdn| and. did not hold the fire at all, but immediately softened and warped outof, ‘shape, allowing' the! pre free passage to,the -mill.”’ ‘ , , j ‘ Mr. Woodbury, the inspector, relates _ thq’following, as the result of his examination in thd case of the late fire at the Pacific Mills:— " ;< “'At end,o£.ihe, steaming, room, “'where the'fire'originated, is’an ISin. brick fire Wall, in which are double doors made of 2in. ■plank*; and :.tirine’d-! on: both sides, put in, m-T 1 ani informed, at the instance Of.’Mr. Whiting,; within five years. The: flames were in direct ‘contact with. ;one , door during an hour or an hour and a half, ;in which timethe buildingdn ffii» (was destroyed’; but no flame entered the ""other room, and only a portion of the' paint on .the 'other door,’ ISin.-distant,’ was blistered. 1 ' tlpdn removing the. rtini from the door winch 'resisted the fire,' it was found that the wood--1 had been charred to the depth of three-eighths.: of.ah inch. A tinned wood door on the same floor, at the entrance to the picking building, ' .‘subjected to a somewhat less degree of heat,’ resisted all action of the fire. ■ <' ' ‘ On the westerly side of the pressing-room (the: corner room) is a sliding iron door, constructed of Jin. iron, and; heavily backed by 7-l6in. iron. The panels:: were 'about. 6in.; width, so .that , most of ,the door, is ll’-16in.:in 'tbickness.' This door is hung on; trucks,’and when .shut three sides are in iron grooves ; the’ "fire department of the Atlantic Mills threw a large amount ofwater in to. this room soon after alarm was given, and only a portion of the
floor-was'burned; .yet this door is'so badly warped that if: dan be moved only’.with great difficulty.” . V The appearance of the doors, and the'statements of the experienced persons present at the fire, are to the effect that wood doors covered with tin successfully;pesisted intense heat for a long time) and that iron doors of exceptionally good Econsfriiction Iwafped under a comparatively slight degree of heat. . The objections to iron doors are equally applicable to shutters. It is notorious that while these have, in many cases, proved powerless to prevent the; spread of the fire, the difficulty of opening them, haa seriously impeded; the 1 work of . extinguishment. .. Wooden shutters backed with tin would undoubtedly prove a far better safeguard. The same principle applies 'to all beams and supports. Wood will .not readily lose its shape or its; strength when subjected to hbat) If property’encased in a non-.comhus-tible) it cannot' btirii ; it will' slowly char, while its non-conducting powers will keep back the fire.;’ The use of iron,for. fire-proof purposes is- a'falb.oy which is fast being exploded. , . . , . ' .
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM18790325.2.24
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Times, Volume XXXIV, Issue 5612, 25 March 1879, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
679FIREPROOF DOORS.—IRON v. TIN. New Zealand Times, Volume XXXIV, Issue 5612, 25 March 1879, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.