Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EXPLOSION THEORY

; ) . , , V vNO EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT (M> Tel«*ra®b— Special to “Ttaa Hail”) CHRISTCHURCH, This Day. Mr H. F. Baird, a member of the staff of the Magnetic Observatory, who* has investigated the devastated districts for some weeks, found no evidence of explosions. “In my opinion,” he said, “there is not one tittle of evidence to support the explosion theory. Certainly hiU spurs and'.faces have lurched out for great distances, but the apparently ejected material does not owe its present situation to being thrown out through the air, as many think. I have no doubt geologists can explain the seismic convulsion quite satisfactorily, and I am not aware of any seisomographic record which' supports the explosive theoiy. In fact the intensity of the phases are all against it as the cause.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM19290729.2.47

Bibliographic details

Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LXIII, 29 July 1929, Page 5

Word Count
131

EXPLOSION THEORY Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LXIII, 29 July 1929, Page 5

EXPLOSION THEORY Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LXIII, 29 July 1929, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert