BRIGHTWATER COURT.
• Several informations were laid for breach of tho Road Board by-laws, and the defendants were fined in each case. Police v. "King, of Richmond. — This was an information under "The Neglected and Criminal Children's Act, 1867," the father being sued to contribute towards tbe support of his son, sent from Nelson to tbe Industrial School at Caversham. Ordered to jay 2s 6d per week. Martin v. Chalmers.— This was an information under the Fencing Ordinance. Plaintiff was nonsuited with costs, the Bench remarking that a civil action should be brought. Mr Bunny appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr Pitt for the defendant. Fairey v Steer for £5 Is 7d, for goods supplied. Judgment for plaintiff with costs. Cock and Buckeridge v. Midgley for £12 4s 7d. Judgment for plaintiffs. Mr Atkinson appeared for the'plaintiffs. Price v. Siggelkow for £4 3s 6d, for goods supplied. Judgment for £3 3s 6d. Mr Pitt appeared for the p'aintiff. Cock and Buckeridge v. Pabl for £9 15s 33 for goods supplied.— Judgment for defendant with costs. Cock aud Buckeridge v. Hodgkinson for £6 8s 7d. Judgment for plaintiffs with costs. Mr Atkinson appeared for the plaintiffs in both these cases. MfMiarwiii |. mMm..,w,mua
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM18801110.2.9
Bibliographic details
Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XV, Issue 222, 10 November 1880, Page 2
Word Count
200BRIGHTWATER COURT. Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XV, Issue 222, 10 November 1880, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in