To the Editor op the Nelson" Evening Mail. Sib — In reply to my letter of April 28th "An Old Member of the Board" asserts that I am "inaccurate" in saying that the Catholic , body is represented;',' there "by one member only." Jf lam " inaccurate in stating tl "s, I am at a loss to understand what he means; for, I speak of that member (the only Catholic there is now ' 1 the Board) in reference to "that body" who, "in conjunction with others of a different cast, have got the upper hand in the Pent'al Board." That the Hon Mr Weld's two co' eagues and lvs «' coreligionists " determined "tl^t my instruction given in schools should be Sc : from aH • controversial character," I deny the fact, for I knew 7 his •• core! : gionis s," and ce.i^nly they never determined 'to frame such a c!;,'<;se, wJ'ch they conside. 3d impracticable. J wish they bad adopted the' clause which he, as a member of the Education Committee then propose J, thus : — - 7 "Government ti afford assistinc; +'. all we 1 '- schools that give a cer*~!h rmount of -. jTsecnlar instruction to the satisfrsdon of a Government inspector; the Government not n any way to interfere in the religious nsi; action ; ; given in schools." To assert, with "An Old Member" that tbe clause in question, which was enacted for .he sole benefit of the Catholics, is utterly use-ess 7;o any otberbodyr as they do not want it, and wfl nol use it, is :* inaccurate,'* for it is not long since a religious body applied for it, nd I doubt whether they are inc 1 : aed to build a school at thei? own c expense. Again, " An Old Member " asserts that Miss C.rner is herself a Catholic; this also is inaccurate, and - although I admit tbat Miss Corner's history, in general is tempera' , yet she cannot be exempted from having given, nere a .d there, an intemperate " account of ttros^ times '■ which follow." A Catholic will po^ consider her teruperate when she relates that in 1846 " many efforts were made by the Roman Clergy and ihe Jesuits to proselytise Protestants." Also, when she - styles the', re-establishment of the Catholic '• Hierarchy in England with the name of.-," Papal aggression:" Tn regard to assail edition. of Lingard's history,. l know for a fact that it has bc3n,a)ready pbjectc .1 toby i'rotes!- ACs, a'though "An Old Member " grar^tousy asserts the reverse. •A> '- ' ' ■ ■ ' Akidwhen the same member exclaims -" let us have the Douay version, rather, than none at all," he knows very we I '' that this is not practicable, and that n a Catholic version is b be read, there will be no Protestant iiechev wlio would be wil 'ing to do it; in like manner, if a Pro rstanfc version is to be used, no Catholic teacher w:l?l do itV ahd such a ! t.achCT/mllbe, by. the fact, prere»fed foom taking the'cfc?!*ge of a school i ■■. which it has to be read. 7" • -•. I anip&c., •• ■".' '■'7' 7 7 GiLTEoboirs.. ;
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM18730508.2.11.4
Bibliographic details
Nelson Evening Mail, Volume VIII, Issue 110, 8 May 1873, Page 4
Word Count
498Untitled Nelson Evening Mail, Volume VIII, Issue 110, 8 May 1873, Page 4
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.