Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

R. M. COURT.

( Before R. Ward, Esq., R.ML) ALLEGED EMBEZZLEMENT. Hugh Mattiieson was charged by |C. "Whitehead with embezzlement of various sums of money ,paid tq aim by customers and not accounted for." *" ' {• Accused pleaded not guilty. ■■'.'.- : The prosecutor expressed a wish to 1 withdraw the charges, but the accused? insisted that the case he proceeded with. The prosecutor gave evidencce m sup-^ of the charge, from which it\appeared j that certain amounts paid to accused by various persons had not been accounted | for. His assistant proved that a bag of flour hadbeen taken by the lad for delivery to a purchaser, and the money had not been given to him. The person to whom the' bag of flour had been delivered deposed that she had pai&accused Accused maintained that only 4s 6d had been paid which amount he htfd given to Mr Whitehead. In reply to the - Be'helrlje denied 1 having received tfie 9s , and that he distinctly remembered 1)00^ uigjthe unpaid balance. , , The constable deposed to his^rre^t 'm Foxtbn'as he was going away with the circus. . „.....-.- ■ \ Accused said he had been asked by ia chuni of Iris named, Kroupa\ to, go with him," and they both got engagements in> the circus. : . ' ■ = The case was^held over for the production of the bread cart pass book. ; | \ '\Qn\the book being -produced accused could not find the entry he had alleged hehadmadeV » ; v;. 7V ! '■-■ The constable stated a number of other charges were^endingi but the witnesses were unwilling to give evidence, i The Bench, though expressing : belief m the guilt of the accused, dismissed the charge undei the,.l97.th clause'of the Act. It was hoped the lesson would be a caution to the accused. . . crviii oases. ' Judgment was given m the following small debt cases viz., -,- „ . . - ; -| Allingham v. T: Hogg.— Claim', £1 ss. J. Millar v. Burr.— Claim, Us 6d. ; In the case Allingham v. D. ; Millar., claim, £1 15s, an order was made for payments by instalments, with usual alternative ; also m case Allingham v. Eeckleben.; i ! The Court then adjourned. . •'■ .' v •

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS18851105.2.13

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume X, Issue 1499, 5 November 1885, Page 4

Word Count
340

R. M. COURT. Manawatu Standard, Volume X, Issue 1499, 5 November 1885, Page 4

R. M. COURT. Manawatu Standard, Volume X, Issue 1499, 5 November 1885, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert