The Buggy Case.
Another stage of tho buggy case was proceeded with at the Feildiug R.M. Court, on Wednesday, when Messrs Halccunbe & Sherwill sued T. Goodison for £57 7s, amount of judgment and costs m the suit Grammar v. Halcombe and Sherwill, m connection with the sale of a buggy the ownership of which has led to considerable litigation. Evidence was given that Malcolm owed Goodison money, and handed over the buggy m lieu of payment. After a lengthy hearing His Worship held that the property of the buggy had not passed to defendant. He was satisfied that the buggy had belonged to the firm, but that Malcolm was not entitled to make the transfer. He thought that defendant's owner* ship of the buggy was all along tainted with doubt on his part, There were certain matters m the affair of which he had knowledge when taking over the buggy, and should have disclosed, which he had not done, although he did not attribute to him deceit with intent to defraud. He then gave judgment for plaintiffs for £40 together with costs, counsels' fee, and witnesses' ' expenses. Mr J. H. Hankins appeared for plaintiffs, and Mr G. F. Hawkins for defendant.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS18841230.2.12
Bibliographic details
Manawatu Standard, Volume IX, Issue 25, 30 December 1884, Page 2
Word Count
201The Buggy Case. Manawatu Standard, Volume IX, Issue 25, 30 December 1884, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.