ST. BATHANS.—June 30.

Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume V, Issue 278, 3 July 1874, Page 2

ST. BATHANS.—June 30.

•E"es.' Magistbate's Cotjbt. (Before H." A. Stratford, Esq., R M.) - Slichael.Healy. for being drunk and incapable, while having charge of a team of horses, was fined 105..' or, in default, twenty-four imprisonment. Turnbull v. Kirltwood.—Wages, £2 9s - 6d. No .appearance. -Struck out.' ; v' : ' " Warden'S Coxtet. (Before H". A. Stv-atfard, Esq., Warden.) The'following'grant was made : —Peter Tiernan, protection for ninety days. . Gr. H. Smith and fourteen others v. the Scandinavian Water Bace Company, registered,—Being, objections to the application of the latter for a special claim in Peymah s Grully—the said claim hithertoknown as the Last Push Company's Channel.—Mr. G-. H. Smith, on behalf of the objectors, stated that they required that therei .should r be; inserted in the deed, lsti. That an, unconditional; outlet for tailings; and tail water;, 2nd. That tho Channel shall be constructed upwards to the head or boundary in Lignite G-ully, , originally intended; 3rd. That if hereafter" \ khe present public or Goternment- Sludgei Channel be deepened that t\e"Last Push Channel (so called) shajj m, also deepened at- the same griJieat'to its head ; and shall not have ; an y"grcy?* u or right to any ground or chan'b'elbw the pegs known as I the L'ast : Push ' Company's pegs and' the 1 juncture of the Government Sludge Channel. •• If these clauses were not put in the company,vrp.uld be able to lock up the " whole basm: against all the miners, but if tb e y were,admitted the objections would be removed." "" •' ii•the.■ same company * witJiarevr, his objectioiion the understandmg that there should be no possible interference .with the Hose, Thistle, andSham- *° mi an y.'s_mming privileges. 'M di J e -^^ man :° f the St - Sludge Channel Trust Companfv. the bame Company. All demands agreed to: by.Mr. sßurton ,6n behalf of the-Scan-dinavian Company; i . Talty and O Dowd v. the same Company. Talty, /_ on; being questioned y-., Mv. ■ i produced his. miner's right, anu a certificate for an; extended ® ai ' n afc Kil dare Hill, and then demanded that applicants shall be bound, as former companies had-beeh, to bring the channel up to the depth; named on the original specifications made- but by Surveyor Ooates as his claim is below the present ievel ot the channel. ; Mr.'Purton, in rep y, stated that the Company was- willing to be bound, by the specifications named. Patrick Talty v. the Same Company.— On being objected to by Mr. Purton, the yV arden. ordered this objector .to produce at the nest sitting of the Court his miners 1 right_and certificate for his claim at Kilai\? * The objection was the same as that advanced by Giles Talty. _1 he objections having been all heard, tne Warden consented, at Mr. Puftpn's icquest, to hear the arguments in reply on the l4th July prox., provided that the su ?yey had been completed before then,, and that Mr. Purton had . served written notices upon the objectors as to the timeana date, of hearing. *