RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT
Tuesday, April 15. (Before H. W. Robinson, Esq., R. 11.) Petchell v. Miller.—This was a claim of 5.5. 6d., balance of account for school fee's. The account was disputed on the ground that during two months of the year 1871 the child on whose behalf the fees were payable did not attend the school. The defendant's wife swore positively that the child did not attend .the school during the months of October aiid November, 1871; but the plaintiff gave evidence exactly to the contrary, and produced his school register in corroboration. Judgment was given for the amount claimed, with 93. costs. Several other cases were settled out, of Court. Law v. Paclgitati.'—Claim, £25 10s. A set-off was put in to the extent of £9 ss. One item of IBs. was disputed, but afterwards an arrangement was arrived at, and judgment given_for £l6 16s. 6d., and 255, costs, to be paid by instalments of £1 p££; week. ♦'Price v. Morony.—Claim, £5 7s.6d r ploughing. .No appearance of Judgment, by default, for amount claiMi with costs 135., and 10s. expenses, SfeTi Bossv. Dugdale. —rClaim of £l3 ps!l|rii| X. 0. XJ. No appearance of defendant.-?^Jaielg-~ meat for amount claimed,4
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MIC18730418.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume IV, Issue 216, 18 April 1873, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
199RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume IV, Issue 216, 18 April 1873, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in