RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
NASEBY, SEPTEMBER 6. . (Before H. W. Robinson, Esq., R.M;) • John Cockeroft, charged by the police with having been drunk, was fined 205., with the alternative of 24 hours' imprisonment'with hard labor. t Same person, charged with resisting . the police, was fined 405., or three days' imprison-' ment with hard labor, f o be ■ cumulative on former sentence. c SEPTEMBER 9. Hjorring v. Haberfield.—Claim, • £lB 78^. for goods supplied. In this case the summons; was not served. • v A* De Lautour v. Tregoning William.—CHirtfy» £2 7s. 6. In this case the defendant improperly designated in the summons, a newsummons was ordered to issue. P. A. Connolly v. John Rooney and /John.Laverty.—This was an interpleader summons for the purpose of determining the ownership of certain property taken in execution in the. suit Laverty v. Boyd, and which was alleged to be the property of the said P. A. Connolly, Exception wa taken to the application having been made by the claimant, instead of by the bailiff. Case dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the application of execution creditors and' the bailiff, and on consent of the claimant Connolly. Mr. Rowlatt for claimant. ;
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MIC18720913.2.13
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume III, Issue 184, 13 September 1872, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
193RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume III, Issue 184, 13 September 1872, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.