Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HAMILTON.—Sept. 20.

WARDEN'S Cotjht. (BeforeH. W. Robinson, EBq.,, Warden,)

Cogan and Otters v. JSToon©.—Complaint, that the defendant had obtained a grant of an extension of his tail-race through the . claim of the defendants at Serpentine, without giving them notice of- his application. It appeared from the evidence, which was rathe rlehgthjr, that the defendant had a tail-race which terminated in the complainants' claim. He had applied to the Warden for an extension through the claim to a point a considerable distance lower down the gullv. He had posted one notice only, and that at the lower end of the proposed extension, and had not served the complainants with notice, or posted any notice upon their claim. The complainants represented that while the tail-race terminated upon their .claim they were able to use the water after the defendant, but if it were to be carried quite tli rough their claim, they would be entirely deprived of the use of the water of the~gully. The Warden decided to cancel- the -certificate for the extension. ' Objection.—Thomas Stephens objected to the grant of a tail-race applied for byWoodmanHore ! , in Main Grully, Hamilton. After hearing some evidence the Warden visited the ground*

and eventually decided to make the grant. >

Objection.—E. Luttrell applied for a tail-rare at Serpentine. Objections had been lodged by Magee and party and W. Eehtz. None of the objectors appeared in person. The applicant stated that Mr. Rehtz had decided not to, press his objection.,. With regard to the objection of Magee, Mr. Cogan said he had been requested by Magee to explain his objection, which was that the discharge end of the tail-race would be only about 150 yards above the head of Magee's race, and that the tailinga could .not fail to inconvenience them. The applicant admitted this was likely, but said he was willing to accept the grant subject to the prior rights of Magee. Granted accordingly. The following grants "were made without opposition:—Evans and Others, extended claim arid tail-race; J. House, extended claim ; J. llundle, residence area; E. Pascoe, residence area; Barclay and Others, head race ; W. Eichardson, extended claim ; S. Treby, extended claim; E. Luttrell,. extended claim ; Grunn and JRobinson, water race; Bailey and Others, extended claim ; G. j Taylor, dam.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MIC18700930.2.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume II, Issue 85, 30 September 1870, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
374

HAMILTON.—Sept. 20. Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume II, Issue 85, 30 September 1870, Page 3

HAMILTON.—Sept. 20. Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume II, Issue 85, 30 September 1870, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert