Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LESSONS FROM THE ELECTIONS.

THE SOCIALIST SET BACK. Now the elections arc over and a majority Government. is elected, if anything, with somewhat, too large a majority, it is well to review what has transpired and gather what lessons we can from the recent battle. The set hack to the socialist party has been the more marked on account of the boasting in which that party indulged before the elections. On its own pronouncements it. was to have 80 candidates, it had 56. It- was going to secure the Treasury benches. It was at least going to largely increase its number in Parliament. Mr. 11. E. Holland modestly referred to himself as “the future Prime Minister.”

The Party’s organisation was increased in all parts of the Dominion. It had much stronger financial means than ever before and its circulation of propaganda matter was multiplied many times over. In the final the party emerges after the election (first count) with four less seats than it had previously. This, however, was not its only loss. During the contest its candidates grew rpiite desperate and performed the strangest antics in publishing false canards and in tearing in very fragrments their own mysterious land policy. In order to “save their bacon” candidate after candidate declared for the freehold and dropped the blessed “usehold tenure” overboard. That the people should own their own homes, not merely occupy and use them, was tjie profession on which these socialist reactionaries struggled to collect votes, and to some extent succeeded.

The party has by such means lost

in prestige though it may have temporarily saved itself from decimation. What is to become of its land policy in the future after the party candidates have thus mauled it about is a question with which the party has still to deal. After the Franklin bye-election Mr. Jordan advised that the “usehold” policy should be dropped. He said the people did not want it. Mr. Holland stood for the policy. This General Election demonstrates that Mr. Jordan was right and Mr. Holland entirely wrong. This leader misled his party and the party members know it. FIGURES AND ADVICE.

To try and save the party’s face Mr. W. Nash, Secretary, New Zealand Labour Party, resorts to figures. He-eontemls that though they lost seats they gained largely on votes. In the matter of figuring this secretary figures badly, in other words what he presents is generally unreliable. He says the party polled 175,000 and 3A00I) over he previous election. On close examination we find it polled 172,005 and its increase (with'l2 more candidates) was 21,258. These figures show that the party barely maintained its voting strength if' it did not actually go hack, because the total of votes east was increased by 11,258. The fact that so many as 172,005 electors voted for this socialist opportunist party’s candidates is one

to which we would advise the. people of New Zealand to give full consideration. It is far too large a number for a parly that toys with “direct action” and other destructive policies to secure. This large vote is, of course,

mainly concentrated in the industrial centres. The members returned are as follows: —Auckland district 5; Christchurch 4; Wellington 2; and West Const (South Island) 2. The moderate parties have to some extent neglected the work of organising in these centres and such neglect should he rectified as early as possible. Otago and Southland will have nothing to do with the returning of Red candidates and we wish to see the North Island follow their example.

It will be a grave mistake if the moderate electors thinking they’ have won complete victory over the extreme socialist and semi bolshevist forces allow themselve to fall into apathy. For the next elections the time to start working is now. The socialist advocates are constantly active; they are specious, cunning and rather unscrupulous in their met hods of advocacy. I hose who stand for the Empire, for constitutional methods at all times, and for co-operation instead of class war should he active from one election to the next. That is our lesson. “Eternal vigilance is the price of. liberty.”

(Contributed by the New eZaland Welfare League).

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19251112.2.5

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, Volume XLVII, Issue 2961, 12 November 1925, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
700

LESSONS FROM THE ELECTIONS. Manawatu Herald, Volume XLVII, Issue 2961, 12 November 1925, Page 2

LESSONS FROM THE ELECTIONS. Manawatu Herald, Volume XLVII, Issue 2961, 12 November 1925, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert