SUPREME COURT.

Manawatu Herald, Volume XLVII, Issue 2959, 7 November 1925, Page 2

SUPREME COURT.

BUSINESS FOR SESSION. For the quarterly sessions of the Palmerston North Supreme Court, commencing next week, the business listed is on the low side. So far there is only one criminal case set down for ’ healing. The list is as follows: — CRIMINAL. (For Sentence). Harry Leo Biggar: Theft of cattle (two charges). (For Trial.) Cyril Henry Osborn Lane: Alleged theft (four charges) and fraud (one charge). CIVIL. (Before Judge and Jury of Twelve.) L. N Slight and others v. A .J. Sanson, claim for £462 13s damages for injuries received in collision between motor ears.

IV. H. Noble v. Hatriek and Coy., Lt., claim for £1165 damages for injuries received in collision between motor driven by servant of defendant and .cart driven by plaintiff.

J. A. R, Andresen and wife (Mr. Cooper) v. T. J. Rowley (Mr. Moody), claim for £703 4s lid damages for medical and other expenses incurred for alleged wrongful and unskilful extraction of teeth. E. D. Hurle v. M. Bennie, claim for £467 15s damages for injuries allegedly received during employment. A. J. Benson v. J. A. O’Neill and wife, claim for £B3l 9s damages for injuries received in collision between motor and bicycle driven by defendant. (Before Judge Alone.) J. W. McConnon and another v. Tamaki Co-operative Dairy Coy., Ltd., claim for £293 5s 3d for work allegedly done and materials allegedly supplied. Counter-claim for £579 7s lOd damages for alleged failure to carry out work as provided in contract and accounts. A. D. Farraher v. L. Marks, claim for £796 7s Id as commission allegedly due on goods sold by plaintiff as agent for defendant.

11. Read v. R. de J. Vautier, eliarn for £779 13s 9d allegedly due under promissory note. P 11. Heap (Mr. Holliugs) v. A. Inge (Mr. Adams), claim for £226 12s allegedly due by estate of which defendant is executor for wages and share of profits from farm.

Dwan Bros. v. C. Redfern, claim for £470 5s 2d damages for alleged breaches of eonvenants of hotel lease.

J Colder (Mr. Ongley) v. D. Brooks (Mr. Cooper), claim for £SOO damages for alleged slander.

IN DIVORCE. (Before Judge and Jury of Twelve). E. M. E. Stevens v. F. Stevens and A. Seeley, petition for disolution of marriage, on grounds of alleged adultery, and claim for £SOO alleged damages. G. Aunabell v. B. Annabell, petition for dissolution of marriage on grounds of separation of three years and upwards. Answer alleges that separation was due to alleged wrongful act of petitioner. (Before Judge alone.) L. Nelson v. J. Nelson, petition for dissolution of marriage on grounds of alleged wilful desertion tor a period of three years and upwards. K. Tofts v. B. Tofts, petition for dissolution of marriage on grounds of alleged wilful desertion for a period of three years and upwards. C. Lassen v. L. Lassen, petition for dissolution of marriage on grounds of mutual separation for period of three years. M. Holman v. P. Holman, petition for dissolution of marriage on grounds of alleged desertion for a period of three years and upwards. A. If. Houghton v. E. Houghton, motion for decree absolute. P. \V. Gaskin, motion for decree P. \Y. Gaskin v. M. Gaskin, motion for decree absolute. IN BANCO.

Hugh Fergus v. Eileen Morgan, appeal from decision of Mr. J. L. Stout, S.M., re adjudication of paternity.

Mary A. Cullinanae v. Woodville County Council, appeal from decision of Mr. Free, S.M., for l’ates. H. M. Garner v. P .A. Phdan, appeal from decision of Mr. J. L. Stout, S.M., conviction under the building by-laws of the Palmerston North Borough Council. Thomas Hopcroft v. E. H. Horner appeal from decision of Mr. J. L. Stout, S.M., conviction under traffic by-laws of Hawke’s Bay Counties. IN BANKRUPTCY. There are motions for discharge in the bankrupt estates of W. P. Casey, Sydney Drake, Herbert Mitchell and D. E. Ross, while there are 31 applications by the D.O.A. for release.