BREACH OF PROMISE CASE.
Hamilton, August 20. In | lie Supreme Court, Agues Mooney claimed £SOO from Richard Hudner, undertaker, for alleged I,reach of promise to marry. Defendant denied a promise to marry and alternatively pleaded that plaintiff s uuehastity.'had released him from such promise. Kvidence was given that plaintiff was co-respondent in a divorce action but she claimed that she had iold defendant about this, and he said it, made no difference. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for £378.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19240821.2.6
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, Volume XLVI, Issue 2774, 21 August 1924, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
81BREACH OF PROMISE CASE. Manawatu Herald, Volume XLVI, Issue 2774, 21 August 1924, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Manawatu Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in