Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LIBEL SUIT

SCHOOLMASTER AND VICAR, PLAINTIFF AWARDED £1 DAMAGES. Auckland, Last Night. In the case at the Supreme Court in which William John May, school teacher at Waimate North, sued the Anglican vicar of Waimate, John William Robinson, for £SOO damages for alleged libel, Air Endean, counsel for the plaintiff, said the school committee summoned the plaintiff to appear before them, and, according to him the defendant accused him of being guilty of immoral teaching to children. Naturally, the plaintiff jumped to his feet and said: “It is a lie.” Defendant amended his statement to “improper teaching.” Apparently, in the course of giving civic instruction to school children, Mr May gave a brief account of the Ponsonby murder trial with the object that it might be a deterrent to boys to commit, crime. Then thei-e was a. reference to a woman who committed suicide to illustrate the meaning' of the term “despondency.” “There was nothing very serious about that,” commented counsel, “Yon will hear from Air Dunlop, advisory inspector, who investigated the matter, that he considered that what was read to the children was reprehensible, and that Mr May was told to do it again.” Air West (for defendant): He was censured. Air Endean: Yes, he was censured, but does that justify a. minister saying that a schoolmaster who had been 42 years teaching was the most unmitigated scoundrel he had ever met?” Cross examined, plaintiff said he did not read the Ponsonby murder case to the children. He mentioned ir. TTe admitted that he might have told the children how an execution took place, and that lie might have drawn on the blackboard a gallows with a trap-door. , A considerable amount of evidence was heard. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for £1 damages. The Judge did not enter judgment and reserved decision on the question of a non-suit.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19231129.2.22

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, Volume XLV, Issue 2665, 29 November 1923, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
311

LIBEL SUIT Manawatu Herald, Volume XLV, Issue 2665, 29 November 1923, Page 3

LIBEL SUIT Manawatu Herald, Volume XLV, Issue 2665, 29 November 1923, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert