Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION COURT.

At a sitting of the Arbitration Court, at Palmerston on Thursday, Mr McKenzie, on behalf of the Employers’ Association, objected to the inclusion of the Palmerston North Hospital Board, the Palmerston North Borough Council, various freezing works, flax mills and dairy companies, and also the Sandon tramline, as parties- to the enginedrivers’ award. The freezing chamber used by the associated butchers of Palmerston North was also entered as rfbt being applicable to the terms and conditions of the award. The Court intimated that as far as the freezing and dairy companies w-ere concerned, it was already familiar with the arguments against their inclusion.

Mr R. T. Bell voiced the objection of the Flaxinillers’ Association to the inclusion of the men employed its stationary engine-drivers at the mills. The employers would prefer that these men should come under the flaxinillers’ award. The other tlaxmill hands had consented to. a reduction in wages, and if the owners found that dairying and pastoral pursuits were more profitable than fiaxmilling, they would resort to farming, and flaxmilling would disappear. Their main objection, however, was to the proposal that employment should he on a daily, basis instead of on a weekly one. Air Read, for the employees, said that the burden was not very heavy, as there was usually, only one man employed in that capacity at each mill. The only exceptions he knew were the mills at Makerua and Whitaunui.

Mr McKenzie urged further that if any one section of the workers received better treatment than others, dissatisfaction would result. The Court reserved its decision on these points.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19210618.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, Volume XLIII, Issue 2291, 18 June 1921, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
266

ARBITRATION COURT. Manawatu Herald, Volume XLIII, Issue 2291, 18 June 1921, Page 2

ARBITRATION COURT. Manawatu Herald, Volume XLIII, Issue 2291, 18 June 1921, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert