THE HAMILTON MYSTERY.
IS IT SMALLFIELD ?
Hamilton, June 14.
The inquest concerning the death of Mr C. R. Smallfield was resumed to-day. Dr, Pinfold, when recalled, said that when he examined the body a pre-molar tooth was missing. He would say that the body was that of the late Mr Smallfield. He did not'notice an appendicitis scar when he made the post mortem. If the operation had been performed nine years ago, in life it might be possible to miss the scar on the skin. When the body was) examined, it was swollen and covered with mould. If the man. half had his appendix removed, it would not render him immune from intestinal trouble. The inquest has been adjourned until Monday, and an order made for the re-exhumation of the body to examine the teeth and appendix, if any.
men at the head of some of the labour bodies who will not approach the industrial problem in a philosophic manner, and it is they who are responsible for much of the unemployment that is at present reported. The Manawatu flaxmillers deserve the utmost credit for having broken the ice, and the example they have set may have far-reaching effects upon the whole industrial community.”
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19210616.2.19
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, Volume XLIII, Issue 2290, 16 June 1921, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
204THE HAMILTON MYSTERY. Manawatu Herald, Volume XLIII, Issue 2290, 16 June 1921, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Manawatu Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in