ALLEGED PROFITEERING.
Wellington. Sept. 21). Argument has finished in the “Big Ben” alleged profiteering ease. The Full Court reserved .judgment. The Court is now hearing (he case of Smith v. Bollins, another alleged profiteering, ease. The appellant had been convicted a I Welling! on and fined .Cloo for selling two hollies of a food at 7s on the ground that this was an unreasonably high price,. Appellant had purchased the food al 25s (id per dozen, and his former price had been 2s Od per bottle.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19200930.2.8
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, Volume XLII, Issue 2183, 30 September 1920, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
86ALLEGED PROFITEERING. Manawatu Herald, Volume XLII, Issue 2183, 30 September 1920, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Manawatu Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in