Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BROKEN CONTRACT.

ABRAHAM LEVY FINED £SO. NOTICE OF APPEAL GIVEN. Welling! on, Yesterday. In the Magistrate’s Court (his afternoon, Air L. G. Reid, S.AL, gave judgment in the case in which the Crown had proceeded against Abraham Levy for a breach of his contract to supply uniforms for members of the New Zealand Expeditionarv Force.

in giving judgment Ills Worship quoted the regulations as already set out. He had already ruled out (ho point dial (hey were ultra vire. The defence raised was practically one of ignorance. Against dial: they had the'fact that (he specifications were produced to the tenderer, and (danse 4 laid down the use of linen thread. The defendant himself signed the contract. Later on he was written to by the Department regarding the matter, and the evidence went to show that the defendant received it, and that he produced it to one of the witnesses. His Worship found on the evidence that the defendant was guilty of the charge. The only other question was as to the penalty. It seemed to him impossible to say (hat a person could accept the conditions of a, tender and sign a contract and have his attention drawn particularly to the alleged breach, and yet he ignorant. The plea of ignorance could not be sustained. The maximum penalty was £IOO. He (his Worship) took into consideration the fact that it was given in evidence that defendant’s contract had been discontinued, and that a, large number of garments were left on his hands. He would impose a penalty 'of £SO and costs. Mr Macassey asked for an adjournment in the other informations.

Mr Gray said that the facts were the same. He submitted that it would savour of' persecution to go on with the other prosecutions. Defendant would June a great many thousands of garments thrown back on his hands.

Mr Macassey said he did not propose to reply to his friend’s remarks at (lie present stage.

Mr Cray intimated that there would be an appeal against his Worship's decision. Security for appeal was fixed at £75.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19160905.2.14

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 1606, 5 September 1916, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
346

BROKEN CONTRACT. Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 1606, 5 September 1916, Page 3

BROKEN CONTRACT. Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 1606, 5 September 1916, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert