Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MARTIN V. EASTON.

JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF TO STAND. On Friday, at Palmerston Mr Justice Hosking gave ment on the motion heard before him in Wellington recently in the case of Nicholas Martin v. Frederick Spencer Easton. At the last sittings of the Supreme Court in Palmerston the jury awarded Martin ,£IOO damages and special j£iß 19s 4d for malicious prosecution. At the close of plaintiff’s case Mr Cooper moved for a nonsuit on the ground that there was not sufficient evidence to support the allegation of want of reasonable and probable cause and no evidence of malice. This was refused leave being reserved to defendant to move. The motion came up for argument in Wellington. His Honour dismissed the motion, and allowed the judgment to stand.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19150302.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXVII, Issue 1368, 2 March 1915, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
126

MARTIN V. EASTON. Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXVII, Issue 1368, 2 March 1915, Page 2

MARTIN V. EASTON. Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXVII, Issue 1368, 2 March 1915, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert