COMPENSATION CASE.
KINLEY V. KING. JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT. At the recent sitting of the Arbitration Court, in Palmerston North, a claim for compensation was made by Hugh Kinley against Abraham King in respect of an accident sustained by plaintiff, who contended that at the time he was employed by defendant, who was therefore liable for compensation. The defence was that Kinley was a contractor, and not an employee. The Arbitration Court delivered its reserved judgment at Wellington yesterday in favour of defendant, holding that Kinley an independent contractor. Ten guineas costs were allowed.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19140430.2.11
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXVI, Issue 1239, 30 April 1914, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
93COMPENSATION CASE. Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXVI, Issue 1239, 30 April 1914, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Manawatu Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in