FLAXMILLERS’ AWARD.
ALLEGED BREACH OF THE PREFERENCE CLAUSE.
CASE ADJOURNED. At the Magistrate’s Court yesterday, the Inspector of Awards (Mr Culver), proceeded against Abraham King of Foxton, flaxmiller, to recover the sum of for breach of the preference clause of the Flaxmillers’ Award by employing a non-unionist when a member of the Union was available. Mr Moore, who appeared for defendant, said that the facts of the case were that the defendant employed one Reaston Baker, to do the work of scutching at his mill on contract. Baker employed another man to assist him whowas not a member of the Union. Mr King was aware that there was a member of the Union willing to take the work, but he (Mr Moore) contended that the employment of an extra scutcher was not in Mr King’s hands as Baker had contracted to do the work at 28s per per ton (the award rate) and had the right to employ his own assistant. Further, on employing the unon-uionist Baker had informed him that it would be necessary for him to join the Union which he had agreed to do, as soon as he received his first pay, as he was unable to join at the time of his employment not having the necessary money to pay the entrance fee. This had since been done. Mr Moore referred to Mr Justice Sim’s recent decision in the matter of contracts and contended that according to that decision the defendant in this case was not under the Award as
the work of scutching had been let by contract. He called the defeudaui who stated that Baker had contracted to do the work of scutching at 28s per ton. Baker arranged for whatever assistance he required and paid himself. Defendant paid Baker the lull amount for the .scutching dune and had nothing to do with Baker’s men.
In answer to Mr Culver defendant said that there was no written contract.
Mr Culver contended that scutching was piecework and not contract.
The Magistrate said that if piecework were to be accepted as contract the Award would be o( very little use. He would have to consider the question. In order to allow witnesses to be called the Magistrate adjourned the case until next court day.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19091007.2.16
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXI, Issue 491, 7 October 1909, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
378FLAXMILLERS’ AWARD. Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXI, Issue 491, 7 October 1909, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Manawatu Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.