A FISH CLAIM.
At the local S.M. Court yesterday, Anderson and Young (Mr Moore) proceeded against A. Almond (Mr Hindmarsh), to recover the sum of £l6 15s 6d for fish supplied. This case had been adjourned from last Court day when evidence of witnesses for plaintiff who were unable to attend this sitting of the court, was taken.
Evidence of certain witnesses for the defence had also been taken in Wellington. For the plaintiffs Mr Moore called James Wilson, Walter Walker, William Neville and John Hannah, who all stated that it was not usual for fishermen to clean flat fish before sending them to Wellington. In the case cf schnapper and other round fish, they would sometimes clean them in order to reduce their weight* It was also the usual practice that if fish arrived in bad order, they would be immediately advised by wire.
For the defence, Mr Hindmarsh called A. Lazarette, who said that in very hot weather fish may go bad in a few hours. If a consignment of fish were found to be bad on arrival it was usual to im» mediately telegraph the consignor. A. Almond, defendant, in evidence, stated that the fish were bad on arrival, and that he had advised plaintiffs by letter. He did not know that it was the usual practice to advise by telegram. Some of the fish had been taken to the destructor, and he had paid a man to take another lot away.
After counsel had addressed the court, the Magistrate found that plaintiffs had executed reasonable care in forwarding the fish, and if they were bad on arrival, defendant should have advised them immediately by telegram. This he had not done. He was also of opinion that defendant had not taken the fish from the station immediately on their arrival, as according to one of defendant’s witnesses, he had taken delivery of three cases at one time, and plaintiffs account showed that only one case at a time had been forwarded. Judgment was given ,for plaintifff for amount claimed £l6 15s 6d, court costs jC i 12s, solicitor £2 7s and witnesses expenses
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19090605.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXI, Issue 460, 5 June 1909, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
356A FISH CLAIM. Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXI, Issue 460, 5 June 1909, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Manawatu Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.