S.M. Court.
(Before A. D. Thompson, Esq. S.M.) Friday, 29th January, civil. A. R. Osborne v. Taurewa Claim £1 9s 6d. Judgment for plaintiff by ’ f 'ult for amount claimed and costs 9s. James Wilson v. J. Carrian,— Claim £1 15s Bd. Judgment for plaintiff for amount claimed and costs 6a.
Stevens, Easton & Austin v. Philip Henneasy.—Claim £l7 Gs 2d. No appearance of plaintiffs. Mr Moore, who appeared for defendant* applied for costs, which the Magistrate allowed. Judgment for 12s costs and solicitor’s fee £1 Is.
0. L. Barnard v. Isidore M. Cohen. —Claim £3 10s. Judgment by default for amount and costs ss. Mr R. Moore appeared for plaintiff.
J. W. Walsh V. R. J. Pratt.— Claim £3. Judgment by default for amount and costs 12s, colicitor’s fee ss. Mr R Mooi‘e appeared for plaintiff. Smale & Hay v. F. Robinson.— Claim £2 Ss 6d. Judgment by de--fault for amount and costs Ss.
A. R. Osborne v. Wi Honiara. ~ Claim £1 ss. Judgment ’by default for amount, and 8s costs. Thomas Connolly v. Prank Glover. —Claim £5. Judgment for plaintiff' for 10s; Court costs, 10s, Mr Cooper appeared for plaintiff, and Mr R, Moore for defendant.
Thomas Westwood and Co. v. Gillanders Bros.—Claim £4 18s Id. Judgment by default for amount, costs Bs, solicitor’s fee ss. M. 11, Walker v. Gillanders Bros. —Claim £9 ss. Judgment by default for amount, and 8s costs. M. Walker v. Frederick Robin* son. Claim£7 12s lid. Judgment by default for amount, and 8s costs. M. H, Walker v. Epariama Manariki.—Claim £1 9a 3d. Judgment by default fop amount, and 11s costs.
Cr. fl. Stiles v. Timothy Castles. —Claim £1 3s. Judgment by default for amount, and 5s costs. Mr R„ Moore appeared for plaintiff, William Nye v. James Lambess. —( laim £1 Os. Judgment for amount, and 5s costs. Clara Loveday v. Frederick Robinson. - Claim £3 8s 2d. Plaintiff admitted a contra account of £1 18s 3d. Judgment for £1 9s lid ; costs, 7a ; solicitor’s fee, ss. Mr R. Moore appeared for plaintiff. R. Moore v, J. A. Perreau.— Claim £2 10s. Judgment for amount, and 8a costs. SEPARATION ORDERS. Flora Anderson and Mary Anderson applied for summary separation orders from Charles Anderson and William Anderson respectively, but the Magistrate dismissed both cases.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19040130.2.16
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, 30 January 1904, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
378S.M. Court. Manawatu Herald, 30 January 1904, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.