S.M. Court.
(Before A. Greenfield, Esq., S.M.) Thursday, 28bd July. CRIMINAL. Police v. Perawiti te Puke.—Two charges were heard of being on licensed premises, being a prohibited person, and for procuring liquor. Fined 20s on each charge, costs 14s. William John Crichton and Fred. Prankland Godfrey were, charged with same offences, being prohibited persons, and were each fined 20a on tub Charge ooit* Ui,
Albert Wong Lee was charged with using obscene language in a public place, and was fined 80s and costs 7s. The case of Richard Walden, for assaulting Thomas Mitchell, was dismissed. -Jk omt. Judgment by default was given in the following oases A. R. Osborne v. Paora.—Claim £4, c sts 10s. E. P. Osborne v. Alex. Claim £3 10s, Costs fii. R. T. Betty v. Alfred Morgan.— Claim £ll9s, costs ss. T. Westwood v. N. B. Reid.— Claim £7 Is fid, costs and fee, £1 8s fid. In the case of 0. Cook v. A. Cook, plaintiff was non-suited. Mr Hankins appeared for defendant, and Mr Innes for plaintiff. 0. T. Easton v. Waites Strang.— Claim £6O. Adjourned to Palmerston Court on 28th July.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19030725.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, 25 July 1903, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
188S.M. Court. Manawatu Herald, 25 July 1903, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in