Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Mrs Maybrick.

TO BE RELEASED NEXT YEAR. Mrs Maybrick is to be released in July, 1904 “ This certain, is and is nothing new, except so far as the public are concerned,” was the answer of a Government official to an inquirer. A life sentence, where the prisoner obtains an unbroken good conduct record, means, in the ordinary way, 20 years imprisonment. The Home Office has, therefore, made the greatest rebate possible in Mrs Maybrick’s case. Her prison record, by the way, during 14 years she has served, has been the highest possible. The reason of the intimation of the Home Office as to what is intended 16 months hence, is in consequence of the existence of some important law suits before the American courts, which will require the evidence of Mrs Maybrick'"' before they can be decided. In order to ascertain when this eviwould be obtainable the British Government was approached through the proper channels, and the reply elicited. The Home Office has authorised Mrs Maybrick’s solicitors, in the case at Washington to make use of the fact of her release next year as a reason for urging the postponement of the trial of the law suits. The litigation in which Mrs Maybrick and iier mother, the Baroness E Von Roques, are engaged, involves immense tracts of land in the States of Kentucky, Virginia, and West Virginia, and adds another romantic chapter to the history of the prisoner. The title and interest in two and a half millions of acres of land in those.states, valued at about seven and- a half million dollars, or roughly a million and a half, are at stake. It is . claimed that unless Mrs Maybrick is able to bear testimony in this case before the Virginian Courts, she and her mother will lose all claim to the land. The two women signed deeds’ which they assert purported to' allow certain persons to deal with only a., small portion of the lands, but which the holders now maintain represent the entire property They .contend,, in brief, that their signatures -Were obtained from them by fraud, and the prospective frial is the greatest interest in the U.S.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19030604.2.17

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, 4 June 1903, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
360

Mrs Maybrick. Manawatu Herald, 4 June 1903, Page 2

Mrs Maybrick. Manawatu Herald, 4 June 1903, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert