Peculiar Case.
__♦ Judgment was given by Mr G. 0. Kettle, 831., at Waoganui in the case of Francis E. Jones (Mr Barnicoat) v. W. Neilson (Mr Tread- „ well), claimed £iG 6* for damage to cattle. The .Magistrate said he f.nu'.d come to no other . conchmoa than thai; plaintiff' .h cattle which were crruzing on defendant's land by agreement, were ppeyed by defendant as alleged. Dvfendant'ii own cvi* dence and diary entries showed a ■ clumpy attempt to fabricate evidence and mv Hated and concealed entries. Defendant's demeanoor also in the g box sati-firfd him that a case had iieen triads out against him. Even if i he agreement jwa!>, as alleged by l^fonrianf, that he was t|> have no re-poo -ability, that would! not protect him from such an act as mutilating the cattlp. .No doubt the conclusion' w;v* only an inference, but in Hin Worship.'* opinion the inference was irresistible. As &o jgi-jter of stock the onus was on the defendan 1 ; to acoiupt for the cattle being speyed, and he bad altogether failed to di sq. , The opinion of the C,)tirt was rhat defendant did it. He bnd all the necessary in|trumenta -tnd had been in the habit of speying his own cattle. Judgment was given for the amount, olaiimd and £8 17s 6d coats. "'" ' — -r V • ■ !'..
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH18990620.2.17
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, 20 June 1899, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
218Peculiar Case. Manawatu Herald, 20 June 1899, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.