Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Our Laws.

The Wellington Grand Jury through their Foreman (Mr Geo. Fiaher) said to the Judge that the jury desired to emphasise the inconvenience caased both to citizens and the country generally by putting in motion all the machinery of the Supreme Court to try cases of a petty nature, which they thought should come before the minor Courts. In their opinion there was a defect; in the law, and they hoped the Legislature would remedy it. His Honor said there was doubt the distinction as to those cases which might be dealt with in the Magistrate's Gourt was not aatisfao tory. It not only caused great in" convenience, but great expense was incurred in bringing witnesses in from the country. He was satisfied something better might be done than had been done by the Legislature in this matter.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH18951205.2.16

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, 5 December 1895, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
139

Our Laws. Manawatu Herald, 5 December 1895, Page 3

Our Laws. Manawatu Herald, 5 December 1895, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert