Magistrate's Court.
(Before R. L. Stanford, Esq., S.M.)
Thursday, Jult 4.
B. Gray v. W. Hanier.— Claim £2 14s 6d. Mr Ray for plaintiff. No appearance of defendant. Judf* mcnt for amount and costs.
A. S. Bias v. W. Howa.— Claim £85 11s Bd. Mr Crump appeared for plaintiff. Mr Hankine for de« fendant. The case was adjourned by consent of both parties to Monday at Palmerston.
P. Henneesy & Co. v. W. Owen. — Claim £10 19s ud. No appearanct of defendant. Judgment for amount and costs, 235.
W. H. Howe v. E. Gascolgne.— ■ Claim £21 11s lOd. Mr Hankinß for plaintiff.
This was v question of accounts and entailed the history of a dishonoured cheque for £10 which got into the hands of a third party. There was also a claim for £7 money lent and interest and some potatoes. After hearing the evidence of the plaintiff and defendant the Magistrate struck out all the items in the claim with the exception of tht 410, for which he gave judgment but refused cosfca.
Execution was stayed for 14 dayi on the application of defendant.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH18950706.2.13
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Manawatu Herald, 6 July 1895, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
184Magistrate's Court. Manawatu Herald, 6 July 1895, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in