HELENSVILLE S. M. COURT

Kaipara and Waitemata Echo, 7 August 1914, Page 4

HELENSVILLE S. M. COURT

WEDNESDAY, sth. AUGUST

(Before Mr E. H. Page, S.M.)

CIVIL CASES Stewart Bros. Ltd., v Natana Hamona, judgment for £5 Os lOd and costs £3 3s 6d Same v H. Rogers, judgment for £7 15s 2d, costs £1 13s 6d. Stewart Bros v Waru Rapana, judgment for £9 16s Id, costs £1 3s 6d. (Mr E. Thurlow Field appeared in the above cases). E. S. Masters v R. H. Bates (Mr J. Beale), judgment for £46 13s 7d and costs. Dresden Piano Co. v E. S. Masters. Evidence was taken on behalf of the defendant, for whom Mr Field appeared. Mr Beale appeared for plaintiff. Stallworthy v Stewart Bros. Evidence for the defendant was taken herein. Mr Field for defendant; plaintiff was not represented, DEFENDED CASES Jones Bros.' v Tamihana, • claim £6. (Mr Field for plaintiffs, Mr Beale for defendant). Judgment for defendant for costs £1 13s, JUDGMENT SUMMONSES N. Pavich v. John Fenton.—Order made for payment of £6 5s within one month. Stewart Bros. Ltd, v Edwards and Hetaraka. —Order made for payment of £8 6s at £1 a month ; in default 7 days. Same v D. McOormack. —Order for payment of £27 15s 8d at 10s per month ; in default 27 days. Same v Hone Parine —Order for payment of £7 17s 3d within one month ; in default 7 days. Same v Mita Matiu—Order for £9 0s lid at 10s per month ; in default 9 days. Same v Kaipuke—Order for £8 13s in one month; in default 9 days. Same v Thomas Nepia —Order for £5 19s lOd at £1 per month ; in default 6 days. J, Stewart v Manukau—Order for £9 lls 24 at 10s per month ; in default 10 days. Stgwart Bros, v Wiri Henare — Order for £19 5s 2d at lQs per month; in default 20 days, (Mr E. Thurlow Field appeared for the creditor in all the above cases.) Worth v Kaneri—Order for £4 3s 7d at £1 per month; in default 4 days. (Mr Beale appeared for the creditor in this case.) POLICE CASES Ernest Mascall and Louis Blanche, charged with riding bicycle on fqotpath in Hetensville, were fined 5s an.d 7s costs. The police explained the dirty state of the roacj in th.c vicinity. E.. McEwin and W. R r Fosbrqke, for allowing cattle to wander, fined 10s and costs 7s, and on a, charge of neglecting a warning a fine of 20s and costs 13s was imposed on the latter case Twq territorials fqr non-attendance at training; qa,mp—Qne case was adjourned till next Court day, and the other, who was a second offender-, was fjned £4 and and costs 75,, Three young men, who were defended by Mr Hall^Skeltqn of Auckland, were brought up on two charges of insulting behaviour towards a young lady in Commsrcial Road, and also with smashing- a bper bottle an the footpath. After hearing, a cjeal qf evidence, th_e Bench said l|e would have tq dismiss the charges, althqugh lie \yas quite sure that one of the accused committed both offences, but/ unfortunately the police could not prove who the real offender was. ' ■ I