Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Wednesday, January 11, [Before H. A. Stratford, Esq., R.M.] J. Mulvihill was charged on the information of Constable Nash with having sold liquor to a person iii a state intoxication.—The constable deposed tcf having seen a man named Murphy wandering about the Main street, on Sunday evening, and apparently drunk. He saw him go into the Court House Hotel, and followed him in. Saw a measure of beer partly full. Witness tasted it. He had previously cautioned every publican in the town against serving the man.—The evidence of C. A. Jones was to the effect that he saw Murphy in the passage, but could not say whether he was drunk or sobeh lid did not stagger. —*Mr Warner addressed the Court for defendant, and called— E. Murphy, who deposed that he was perfectly sober at the time mention' d by the constable, and that he asked for' drink, but was refused it. The only man he saw drink was the constable who tasted the beer in the measure.' The Magis) rate stated that had the case been clearly proved, he should havefelt it his duty to inflict a very heavy fine. The police were acting as benefactors to the accused.—Case dismissed. The same defendant was then charged with allowing his house to be open within prohibited hours.—ln this case, as in the former, Mr Warner appeared for the defendant.—Evidence was taken,and the case was dismissed. CIVIL CASES. Wade v Bowen.—This was a claim! for .£1 15s, for goods supplied.—lnhere was no appearance on the part of the defendant, and judgment was given by default. Creber and others vJ. Whelan. ' This was a claim for money due on a contract, in which ?5 per cent, progress payment had been agreed to be paid.—> Evidence was taken, and the case was adjourned to the 25th inst., for the purpose of allowing the Road Overseer' to make a valuation of the work, each party agreeing to abide by bis decision.-

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/KUMAT18820112.2.8

Bibliographic details

Kumara Times, Issue 1650, 12 January 1882, Page 2

Word Count
330

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Kumara Times, Issue 1650, 12 January 1882, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Kumara Times, Issue 1650, 12 January 1882, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert