TE KUITI MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

King Country Chronicle, Volume VIII, Issue 646, 25 February 1914, Page 5

TE KUITI MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24th, 1914

(Before Mr E. Rawson, S.M.)

Judgment went by default in tke following cases: —Cole v. Rewai 17s, cost 9 12a 6d; Hawley v. Mra Hawera, 35b —26a; Waitomo County Council v. Searancke, £ll 2s lOd —£2 6s; Green and Colebrook v. Aro Aro, £3l 5s 11 —£4 lis 6d; Fullerton v. Lusk, £ll 3s —20a 6d; Cotter Bros. v. Turner, 355—,12s 6d; Broadfoot and Fir.lay v. Cooke, £l4 Is—2os; Fletcher v. Ferguson, £l4l 8s —£1 2v ; Hillary v. Blake, 13b sd—6s; Kuro Muraahi v. Tukino Ratima, £7 10s 9d—37s 6d; Stott and Hoare v. Newton, £6 —31s; Ellison v. Garmonsway, 35a 6d —6a; same v. Garmonsway, £lB 14s —cost* 325; Fullerton v. Saunders, £2 12s 6d —355; Tb Kuiti Borough Council v. Garmonsway, £l3 10s 3d—-325; Green & Colebrook v. Sowry,£2 18s 6il—loa; Hillary v. Chilcott, £3 9s 6d —-10s; Ellison v; . same, £9 6s—-23s 6d; Newberry v. Coburn, £ll 6s 8d —£3 2s; Bnles v. Newtnn, £ll 16s—£2 8s; Stevens v. Taituko lliriakn, £3 Is 2d —37s 6d; Hacket v Setran eke, £1 —7s 6d; Sams v. Turner, £6 10s—26s; White v. Guilford, £3 10s—--365; Fullerton v Donkin, £s—los; Patti-3on and Lockington v. Taylor.®£s —2Bs; Boles v. Crombis, £3 Is —10s; Pio Pio Town Hall Company v. Nui Ratima, £4 —33s 6d. Judgment Summo-ispy. Orders were made in the following cases: Cole v. Rawiri, £1 19s lOd; Graham v. Wairoa, £lO 2s Od r Green and Colebrook, v. Whareors, £9 2s 9d; same v. Tnheka, £ls 113 4d; seme v, Robinson, £l2 13s 6d; Hawley v, Rawiri, £2; Keighley v. Manning, £8 8b; Walker v. Taylor, £3 15s 9d; Graen and Colebrook v. Rawiri, £23 Is. Defaulting Poundkeeper.—V. T. A. Garmonsway was charged with failing to pay over money held for the Borough Council under the Impounding Act after payment had been formally and legally demanded. He was convicted and fined £23 8a and costs 345, the amount to be reduced to £lO if £l3 is paid to the Borough Council within 21 days.

On a charge of failing t>. keep propar books the same defendant was convicted and fined £3 and costs 345, or in default 21 flays' imprisonment with hard labour. >.;ar Drivers' Difference. Peter Wilkie, charged with assaulting Clarence Pole, was defended by Mr Finlav and pleaded guilty. In extenuation, Mr Finlay said both parties were motor car drivers and a difference arose in consequence of complainant blocking the road, when the assault waa committed. A fine of £2 and costs £2 os 6d was inflicted.