CORRESPONDENCE.

King Country Chronicle, Volume VI, Issue 420, 6 December 1911, Page 5

CORRESPONDENCE.

ll.dins lor publiealinn, ami ailulcs lm msrilmn intisl Ik- acdiiieamcil I"" 1 necessarily l.»r puUiealionl, tiv the name <>l ll.c writer, :iml, pmvtilc.l 11 icy are imt ollcnsivc in any way, will lie mlilishc.l as ; ,|iaee permits. 'I lie K.lilur Tntut iilcnlilv liimsellwith the opinions expresscil iv corrcspomlenls, ami accepts mi responsibility ciitlicin.l To the Editor. Sir,—l believe you h;ivo been a resident; of this town for sometime and thereforo you should bo acquainted with the laws of the land an far aw Te Kuiti is concerned. What I wish to know is this: Is there an act in force that allows the lessees of Native township sections to acquire (.lie freehold? If such an Act i-< in force why do not the people of Te Kuiti make use of same by acquiring the freehold. I ask as ono wishing to settle permanently in Te Kuiti.- 1 am, etc., FREEHOLD. To the Editor. Sir, I understand that, some montha a | f o a "hriek area" was decided declared in Te Kuiti. and that all new building within that area had to be huill of brick. If that is so, would ! von. or some of the readers of this J paper, kindly let me know why the I midib.on lo the Tost OfTicn was built ! of wood and not of brick.—l. am, etc., J ENQUIRER.