Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RAILWAY "MEANNESS."

To the Editor. Sir, —Is not "Fatigued" a little carping in his criticism? The Railway Department has many sins to answer for and sticks are plenty if one cares to castigate. So far as return tickets are concerned, however, the limit of available time is longer than it is at Home, or in a good many other places. So long as there is a limit it is foolish to talk of "meanness" because it is adhered to. "Fatigued's" argument boils down to a suggestion that the limit be extended by one day. Has he suggested this to the Department? And if the concession is made will he undertake not to appeal to the Lord in pathetic patience when he happens to travel at the end of the new limit. . . and so, ad infinitum. Or does he approve of a limit that is not a limit? No! Rules are rules, and should be enforced, and the Department exhibits not meanness but merit in rigid adherence. My own view is that a railway is a trading concern selling seating accommodation for a given distance at specified rates. If it accepts payment —effects a sale in other words —it should be prepared to deliver the goods on time. Limit on so-called "return" tickets is (legally) dishonest. I would not hesitate to work out a "return half" either a day or a year after I had paid for it. But if fine or imprisonment arrive as a consequence it has to be taken as part of the game and it is idle to whine about "meanness." The trouble lies in the limit —and that is not meanness but fraud. If "Fatigued" would allow the boarding of the train within the specified limit of time, to be compliance with the regulations, what would he say to a man who got on in Wellington when the line is open to Whangerei and the "limit." expired ten minutes after the train started. Or consider Vladivostock on a througn ticket to Brussels! I am afraid that "Fatigued's" trouble is subjective, and his lack—logic.—I am, etc., TIRED. P.S. Following "Fatigued" on the railway, I notice the K.C.C. refers to "An Ancient Skull Found"! I« there connection - or merely coincidence ?

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/KCC19110715.2.23.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

King Country Chronicle, Volume V, Issue 378, 15 July 1911, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
372

RAILWAY "MEANNESS." King Country Chronicle, Volume V, Issue 378, 15 July 1911, Page 5

RAILWAY "MEANNESS." King Country Chronicle, Volume V, Issue 378, 15 July 1911, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert