Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BAD WRITING.

ANNOYING MODERN FAD.

lUJNIC INSCRIPTIONS CONDEMNED

Among the many modern fads that the world would be far better without the most annoying is the adoption by business men of Runic characters for signing their names (writes “A Harassed Business Man” in the London Daily News), The outstanding characteristic df Runic inscriptions is that only those who write them know what they mean.

And so it is with quite two-thirds df the signatures appended to the letters one receives nowadays, business letters especially. They are quite undecipherable by all except the person who wrote them and possibly his clerks.

There is nothing more irritating than being unable to read the signature at the foot of a letter ; yet some of us are faced with this difficulty every day. A letter is neartly typed, probably well written, but fails to indicate the most important of all—who wrote it. You turn it this way and that, try all the customary devices for deciphering writing ; then you ask somebody else. After three or four people have wasted time over the scribble you have to give it ®P, knowing that if you do not give the correspondent his correct name when y< : «u answer he will be much offended. That is one of the inconsistencies <,f people who wilfully turn their signatures into callgraphic puzzles. So proud are they of their invention that they regard as a personal slight inability to fathom its meaning, Although what is intended for “John Smith” may look like a row of palings uprooted by a gale, you, t,he unhappy recipient, are expected to recognise it at first glance.

The bad practice of writing personal signatures illegibly is becoming more prevalent. Some adopt it as a precaution against 'forgery, though it is not; some because they think it is distinctive and “shows character.”

Really, it shows only carelessness. A few business men have adopted the practice of having their names typed above their signatures on letters. If this commendable device were in general use it would save >a vast amount of trouble.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HPGAZ19270228.2.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hauraki Plains Gazette, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 5094, 28 February 1927, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
344

BAD WRITING. Hauraki Plains Gazette, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 5094, 28 February 1927, Page 1

BAD WRITING. Hauraki Plains Gazette, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 5094, 28 February 1927, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert