Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHESS

new ZEALAND CHAMP-ON3IIIP. THREE ROUNDS • NOW COMPLETI (Per Press Association, Copyright)

DUNEDIN, December 28. Play was resumed in the thiid round of the Neiv Zealand Chess Championship thi s morning, and the afternoon was devoted to unfinished grmes, the fourth round being started at the evening session. It was announced that two special prizes had been given by competitors. Y r Ke.ling having made a. donation of £2 2s for a brilliancy prize, and Mr PiW a similar amount for the best ipco\ ery prize. The first three rounds are now completed. Round One. —Gyles heat Hicks. GJ’le , who had a. move, chose a Buy Lopez opening, and Hicks defended ui.h t e Heinit" defence. Opportunities were missed by both players, and Hicks eventually forked a bishop and ioo< with a knight. Gyles withdrew WN rook, leaving the bishop unsupported Hicks took the bishop, which resulted in lost position.

Round Two.—Jones v. Gyles (Queen- s Pawn opening): —Jones had the nune. Gyles defended with the Indian defence Although not a. spectacular g me, it was followed by the onlookers wi-b keen interest. It became ,ve.r.y com-pji-eaied, and .finally a ; draw was agreed upon on the s ; xty-Seventh move. Watt v. Kelling (French Kelling,. who had the move, missed a chance /of gaining, two minor pieces for a rook in the middle o ihe game. Several exchanges followed, and, resulting in an end game, -it looked like a draw. when. Kelling made an unsound sacr'fice, losing a rook foi a pawn, which entailed his resignation at move 37.

Third Round.— Dnnl p v. Jones :—An Alekihine defence was transposed in-o a Vienna opening. Dunlop had the move. A couple of moves after an exchange of pawns and knights, and queens • were exchanged, leaving Dunlop in a strong centre position, and on the fifteenth move he captured an isolated pawn. Dunlop developed his attack. Jones resigned on the forty-sixth move. Le Petit v. Severne (Queen’s Pawn game) :—Le Petit had a move. Severne defended the opening wi h a Qambridge Springs defence, but omitted one of the attacking moves in opening. This allowed his opponent to -break up the attach,' and obtain rather a better game. After exchanges, each player was left with two rooks and six pawns, and a draw was agreed upon on the thirty-eighth move. Gyles v. Scott-.—Scot,- h d a move, and played the Sow variation of the Paiy Lopez. He sacrificed a pawn for a strong attack, during .which fic/iast a further pawn. Gyles set up a blockade, and. weathered Scot/s" ..atbcic with e.vtra pawns, and : wpn • on 1 the fifty-second move, after a-, . very complicated game, in which Gy.es’ st’atpgy undoubtedly gave him ,an advantage.

Hicks v. Pihl: —A Zukert.ort opening, Hicks .h'vi.rg-’the 1 move; /iftcr-iin exchange of' knights arid pawns on the nineteenth move, Pihl, tnrough a ■ •-reless move, lest his other knight. Eventually Hicks threatened to queen a pawn, and as Pihl was unable to stop it, he resigned on the sixty-fourth move.

Kel ling v. Didsbury:—The opening was Queen’s Gambit Declined. Didsbury had the move. .The game was level until the thirty T seventh move, when Didsbury, who was pushed; for time, lost an exchange. Playing with good judgment he -secured compensation in position, and a long battle ensued. Selling, found the right move in several difficult and indicate positions, and just' managed to .land a. win at move 67.

Fourth Round:—The following wr»* the draw for the four.h .round: .Smith v. Didsbury, Jones vr Gyles v. Dunlop, Kelling. v. Le ARttit, Beverne v. Hicks, Pihl v. Scott. Jones v. Watt (Queen’s Gambit Declined) :—Jones had the move. The game proceeded on j:regular lines and after-a normal number of exchmges, Wrt: had. if anything,, the better position.. He rcade -a bad mistake in taking a queen’s pawn, the result being that he, in order'to avoid mate, would have to sacrifice his queen, so he resigned on the twenty-fi.fr h move. The scores t-o date - are a s follows: Pihl 3. Jones 2-1, Gyles 21, Dunlop 2, Watt 2, iSeverne 2, Kelling 2. ‘Scott 11, Hicks 1-1, Le Petit G Didsbury 1, Smith 0.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19331229.2.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 29 December 1933, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
691

CHESS Hokitika Guardian, 29 December 1933, Page 3

CHESS Hokitika Guardian, 29 December 1933, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert